Graduate Studies at the Nexus of

Global Horticulture and Human Nutrition to Enhance Community Resilience and Food Security

An Overview of the CIPP Evaluation Model

Funding for this project (# 2016-07259) was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Higher Education Challenge (HEC) grant program. This project is in collaboration with the University of Arkansas, Texas Tech University, and The Borlaug Institute at Texas A&M University.

Overview

There are many different models available to guide the evaluation process. Evaluations can take many different shapes –meaning that one model does not fit all situations. Awareness of various evaluation models and approaches provides an important tool for an evaluator because these models provide a starting point in constructing an efficient and effective evaluation. The model reviewed in this reusable learning object is the CIPP Evaluation Model developed by Daniel Stufflebeam. This model encourages an evaluator to take into consideration four aspects: context, input, process and product.

Instructions

Learner time required: 1 hour

Upon completion, the learner will be able to: describe the CIPP evaluation model, identify situations when use of the CIPP model would be appropriate, and explain how the CIPP model compares to other evaluation models.

  1. Watch the CIPP lecture
  2. Review at least two of the articles provided which implemented the CIPP model (links provided)
  3. Take the quiz
  4. Bonus: Watch the YouTube video about the CIPP model presented by Mallory Buzun-Miller (link provided)

Additional Materials and Resources

  • Zhang et al. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-83
  • CIPP EVALUATION MODEL CHECKLISTprovided by Michigan State

Theresa Murphrey

Professor

Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications

Texas A&M University